I
tried my best to take what I could from Donna Wilson’s ‘Endangered Species’
exhibition as; it was the only indoor exhibition at Y.S.P at the time.
Considering the bitter cold minus temperatures I was forced to spend quite some
time viewing this exhibition.
Unfortunately, the only thing I
could take from the exhibition was a greater understanding of what I don’t
appreciate in the Art world, along with a question I still can’t answer; who
appreciates childlike, poorly composed images? And, how did they work their way
into Y.S.P?
Granted, if every painting or
illustration was perfect, precise and detailed then creating an image would be
pointless, eliminating visual communication. However, Wilson’s works,
especially her paintings, do not appear to be intentionally bad. Many artists
intend to create an image that appears inaccurate for a purpose such as Jackson
Pollock or even Ralph Steadman, in order to communicate a skill, illusion or
idea.
Donna Wilson, on the other hand,
does not appear to convey anything through her images other than a lack of
technical ability to replicate an image accurately, or in a manner that is
visually effective. She then
appears to support this apparent lack of technical ability in painting with
extremely poorly written words to support the image.
In light of recent lectures from
industry-leading, overly pedantic typographers I have developed a form of ‘type
snobbery,’ which has lead me to analyse and criticise type in all
circumstances, struggling to avoid my subjective analysis. I was therefore extremely
off-put by the poorly formed, blotchy type on this Donna Wilson image; it seems
to highlight her inability to manipulate her chosen medium.
(the image in this piece is not my own work, it belongs to Donna Wilson/Y.S.P, however I did take the photo).
No comments:
Post a Comment